A model of symbol size discrimination in scatterplots

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Symbols are used in scatterplots to encode data in a way that is appropriate for perception through human visual channels. Symbol size is believed to be the second dominant channel after color. We study symbol size perception in scatterplots in the context of analytic tasks requiring size discrimination. More specifically, we performed an experiment to measure human performance in three visual analytic tasks. Circles are used as the representative symbol, with eight, linearly varying radii; 24 persons, divided across three groups, participated; and both objective and subjective measures were obtained. We propose a model to describe the results. The perception of size is assumed to be an early step in the complex cognitive process to mediate discrimination, and psychophysical laws are used to describe this perceptual mapping. Different mapping schemes are compared by regression on the experimental data. The results show that approximate homogeneity of size perception exists in our complex tasks and can be closely described by a power law transformation with an exponent of 0.4. This yields an optimal scale for symbol size discrimination.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2010), Atlanta GA, USA, April 10-15, 2010
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery, Inc
Pages2553-2562
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Event28th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Florence, Italy
Duration: 5 Apr 200810 Apr 2008
Conference number: 28
http://www.chi2010.org/

Conference

Conference28th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Abbreviated titleCHI 2010
CountryItaly
CityFlorence
Period5/04/0810/04/08
Internet address

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A model of symbol size discrimination in scatterplots'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this