TY - JOUR
T1 - A head and neck hyperthermia applicator
T2 - theoretical antenna array design
AU - Paulides, M.M.
AU - Bakker, J.F.
AU - Zwamborn, A.P.M.
AU - van Rhoon, G.C.
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - Purpose: Investigation into the feasibility of a circular array of dipole antennas to deposit RF-energy centrally in the neck as a function of: (1) patient positioning, (2) antenna ring radius, (3) number of antenna rings, (4) number of antennas per ring and (5) distance between antenna rings.
Materials and Methods: Power absorption (PA) distributions in realistic, head and neck, anatomy models are calculated at 433 MHz. Relative PA distributions corresponding to different set-ups were analysed using the ratio of the average PA (aPA) in the target and neck region.
Results: Enlarging the antenna ring radius from 12.5 cm to 25 cm resulted in a ~21% decrease in aPA. By changing the orientation of the patients with respect to the array an increase by ~11% was obtained. Increase of the amount of antenna rings led to a better focussing of the power (1 ¿ 2/3: ~17%). Increase of the distance between the antenna rings resulted in a smaller (more target region conformal) focus but also a decreased power penetration.
Conclusions: A single optimum array setup suitable for all patients is difficult to define. Based on the results and practical limitations a setup consisting of two rings of six antennas with a radius of 20 cm and 6 cm array spacing is considered a good choice providing the ability to heat the majority of patients.
AB - Purpose: Investigation into the feasibility of a circular array of dipole antennas to deposit RF-energy centrally in the neck as a function of: (1) patient positioning, (2) antenna ring radius, (3) number of antenna rings, (4) number of antennas per ring and (5) distance between antenna rings.
Materials and Methods: Power absorption (PA) distributions in realistic, head and neck, anatomy models are calculated at 433 MHz. Relative PA distributions corresponding to different set-ups were analysed using the ratio of the average PA (aPA) in the target and neck region.
Results: Enlarging the antenna ring radius from 12.5 cm to 25 cm resulted in a ~21% decrease in aPA. By changing the orientation of the patients with respect to the array an increase by ~11% was obtained. Increase of the amount of antenna rings led to a better focussing of the power (1 ¿ 2/3: ~17%). Increase of the distance between the antenna rings resulted in a smaller (more target region conformal) focus but also a decreased power penetration.
Conclusions: A single optimum array setup suitable for all patients is difficult to define. Based on the results and practical limitations a setup consisting of two rings of six antennas with a radius of 20 cm and 6 cm array spacing is considered a good choice providing the ability to heat the majority of patients.
U2 - 10.1080/02656730601150522
DO - 10.1080/02656730601150522
M3 - Article
SN - 0265-6736
VL - 23
SP - 59
EP - 67
JO - International Journal of Hyperthermia
JF - International Journal of Hyperthermia
IS - 1
ER -