A framework to evaluate and compare decision-mining techniques

Toon Jouck; Massimiliano de Leoni; Benoît Depaire

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11641-5_38

A framework to evaluate and compare decision-mining techniques

Toon Jouck, Massimiliano de Leoni, Benoît Depaire

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

During the last decade several decision mining techniques have been developed to discover the decision perspective of a process from an event log. The increasing number of decision mining techniques raises the importance of evaluating the quality of the discovered decision models and/or decision logic. Currently, the evaluations are limited because of the small amount of available event logs with decision information. To alleviate this limitation, this paper introduces the ‘DataExtend’ technique that allows evaluating and comparing decision-mining techniques with each other, using a sufficient number of event logs and process models to generate evaluation results that are statistically significant. This paper also reports on an initial evaluation using ‘DataExtend’ that involves two techniques to discover decisions, whose results illustrate that the approach can serve the purpose.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Business Process Management Workshops - BPM 2018 International Workshops, Revised Papers
Editors	Florian Daniel, Quan Z. Sheng, Hamid Motahari
Place of Publication	Cham
Publisher	Springer
Pages	482-493
Number of pages	12
ISBN (Electronic)	978-3-030-11641-5
ISBN (Print)	978-3-030-11640-8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11641-5_38
Publication status	Published - 29 Jan 2019
Event	16th International Conference on Business Process Management, BPM 2018 - Sydney, Australia Duration: 9 Sep 2018 → 14 Sep 2018

Publication series

Name	Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing
Volume	342
ISSN (Print)	1865-1348

Conference

Conference	16th International Conference on Business Process Management, BPM 2018
Country	Australia
City	Sydney
Period	9/09/18 → 14/09/18

Keywords

Decision mining
Evaluation
Log generation

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-030-11641-5_38

Link to publication in Scopus

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A framework to evaluate and compare decision-mining techniques'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Jouck, T., de Leoni, M., & Depaire, B. (2019). A framework to evaluate and compare decision-mining techniques. In F. Daniel, Q. Z. Sheng, & H. Motahari (Eds.), Business Process Management Workshops - BPM 2018 International Workshops, Revised Papers (pp. 482-493). (Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing; Vol. 342). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11641-5_38

@inproceedings{8049ef0751e3449a9c82850b234d11a5,

title = "A framework to evaluate and compare decision-mining techniques",

abstract = "During the last decade several decision mining techniques have been developed to discover the decision perspective of a process from an event log. The increasing number of decision mining techniques raises the importance of evaluating the quality of the discovered decision models and/or decision logic. Currently, the evaluations are limited because of the small amount of available event logs with decision information. To alleviate this limitation, this paper introduces the {\textquoteleft}DataExtend{\textquoteright} technique that allows evaluating and comparing decision-mining techniques with each other, using a sufficient number of event logs and process models to generate evaluation results that are statistically significant. This paper also reports on an initial evaluation using {\textquoteleft}DataExtend{\textquoteright} that involves two techniques to discover decisions, whose results illustrate that the approach can serve the purpose.",

keywords = "Decision mining, Evaluation, Log generation",

author = "Toon Jouck and {de Leoni}, Massimiliano and Beno{\^i}t Depaire",

year = "2019",

month = jan,

day = "29",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-11641-5_38",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-3-030-11640-8",

series = "Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing",

publisher = "Springer",

pages = "482--493",

editor = "Florian Daniel and Sheng, {Quan Z.} and Hamid Motahari",

booktitle = "Business Process Management Workshops - BPM 2018 International Workshops, Revised Papers",

address = "Germany",

note = "16th International Conference on Business Process Management, BPM 2018 ; Conference date: 09-09-2018 Through 14-09-2018",

}

Jouck, T, de Leoni, M & Depaire, B 2019, A framework to evaluate and compare decision-mining techniques. in F Daniel, QZ Sheng & H Motahari (eds), Business Process Management Workshops - BPM 2018 International Workshops, Revised Papers. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 342, Springer, Cham, pp. 482-493, 16th International Conference on Business Process Management, BPM 2018, Sydney, Australia, 9/09/18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11641-5_38

A framework to evaluate and compare decision-mining techniques. / Jouck, Toon; de Leoni, Massimiliano; Depaire, Benoît.

Business Process Management Workshops - BPM 2018 International Workshops, Revised Papers. ed. / Florian Daniel; Quan Z. Sheng; Hamid Motahari. Cham : Springer, 2019. p. 482-493 (Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing; Vol. 342).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - A framework to evaluate and compare decision-mining techniques

AU - Jouck, Toon

AU - de Leoni, Massimiliano

AU - Depaire, Benoît

PY - 2019/1/29

Y1 - 2019/1/29

N2 - During the last decade several decision mining techniques have been developed to discover the decision perspective of a process from an event log. The increasing number of decision mining techniques raises the importance of evaluating the quality of the discovered decision models and/or decision logic. Currently, the evaluations are limited because of the small amount of available event logs with decision information. To alleviate this limitation, this paper introduces the ‘DataExtend’ technique that allows evaluating and comparing decision-mining techniques with each other, using a sufficient number of event logs and process models to generate evaluation results that are statistically significant. This paper also reports on an initial evaluation using ‘DataExtend’ that involves two techniques to discover decisions, whose results illustrate that the approach can serve the purpose.

AB - During the last decade several decision mining techniques have been developed to discover the decision perspective of a process from an event log. The increasing number of decision mining techniques raises the importance of evaluating the quality of the discovered decision models and/or decision logic. Currently, the evaluations are limited because of the small amount of available event logs with decision information. To alleviate this limitation, this paper introduces the ‘DataExtend’ technique that allows evaluating and comparing decision-mining techniques with each other, using a sufficient number of event logs and process models to generate evaluation results that are statistically significant. This paper also reports on an initial evaluation using ‘DataExtend’ that involves two techniques to discover decisions, whose results illustrate that the approach can serve the purpose.

KW - Decision mining

KW - Evaluation

KW - Log generation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061376240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-11641-5_38

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-11641-5_38

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85061376240

SN - 978-3-030-11640-8

T3 - Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

SP - 482

EP - 493

BT - Business Process Management Workshops - BPM 2018 International Workshops, Revised Papers

A2 - Daniel, Florian

A2 - Sheng, Quan Z.

A2 - Motahari, Hamid

PB - Springer

CY - Cham

T2 - 16th International Conference on Business Process Management, BPM 2018

Y2 - 9 September 2018 through 14 September 2018

ER -