A framework for the systematic comparison and evaluation of compliance monitoring approaches

L.T. Ly, F.M. Maggi, M. Montali, S. Rinderle-Ma, W.M.P. Aalst, van der

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

36 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

To support the whole business process compliance lifecycle, one also needs to monitor the actual processes and not just check their design. Recently, many approaches have been proposed that utilize a broad range of constraint languages and techniques to realize compliance monitoring solutions. Due to this diversity, the comparison of existing approaches is difficult and consequently hampers the evaluation of which approaches are suitable for which application scenarios. This paper provides a framework to compare and evaluate existing compliance monitoring approaches. The framework is based on ten typical Compliance Monitoring Functionalities (CMFs). These have been derived using a systematic literature review and five case studies from different domains. Existing approaches are evaluated based on the CMF framework, resulting in a list of open questions and a discussion of new challenges in this field.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication17th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC'13, Vancouver BC, Canada, September 9-13, 2013)
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Pages7-16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Event17th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2013) - Vancouver, Canada
Duration: 9 Sep 201313 Sep 2013
Conference number: 17

Conference

Conference17th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2013)
Abbreviated titleEDOC 2013
CountryCanada
CityVancouver
Period9/09/1313/09/13

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A framework for the systematic comparison and evaluation of compliance monitoring approaches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this