A correspondence between Martin-Löf type theory, the ramified theory of types and pure type systems

F. Kamareddine, T.D.L. Laan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In Russell''s Ramified Theory of Types RTT, two hierarchical concepts dominate:orders and types. The use of orders has as a consequencethat the logic part of RTT is predicative.The concept of order however, is almost deadsince Ramsey eliminated it from RTT. This is whywe find Church''s simple theory of types (which uses the type concept without the order one) at the bottom of the Barendregt Cube rather than RTT.Despite the disappearance of orders which have a strong correlation with predicativity, predicative logic still plays an influential role in Computer Science.An important example is the proof checker Nuprl, which is basedon Martin-Löf''s Type Theory which uses type universes. Those type universes,and also degrees of expressions in AUTOMATH, are closely related toorders. In this paper, we show that orders have not disappeared frommodern logic and computer science, rather, orders play a crucial role in understanding the hierarchy of modern systems. In order to achieve our goal, we concentrate on a subsystem of Nuprl. The novelty of our paper lies in: (1) a modest revival of Russell''sorders, (2) the placing of the historical system RTTunderlying the famous Principia Mathematica in a context with a modernsystem of computer mathematics (Nuprl) and modern type theories(Martin-Löf''s type theory and PTSs), and (3) the presentation of acomplex type system (Nuprl) as a simple and compact PTS.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)375-402
    Number of pages28
    JournalJournal of Logic, Language and Information
    Volume10
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2001

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A correspondence between Martin-Löf type theory, the ramified theory of types and pure type systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this