A community challenge to predict clinical outcomes after immune checkpoint blockade in non-small cell lung cancer

Mike Mason, Óscar Lapuente-Santana, Anni S. Halkola, Wenyu Wang, Raghvendra Mall, Xu Xiao, Jacob Kaufman, Jingxin Fu, Jacob Pfeil, Jineta Banerjee, Verena Chung, Han Chang, Scott D. Chasalow, Hung Ying Lin, Rongrong Chai, Thomas Yu, Francesca Finotello, Tuomas Mirtti, Mikko I. Mäyränpää, Jie BaoEmmy W. Verschuren, Eiman I. Ahmed, Michele Ceccarelli, Lance D. Miller, Gianni Monaco, Wouter R.L. Hendrickx, Shimaa Sherif, Lin Yang, Ming Tang, Shengqing Stan Gu, Wubing Zhang, Yi Zhang, Zexian Zeng, Avinash Das Sahu, Yang Liu, Wenxian Yang, Davide Bedognetti, Jing Tang, Federica Eduati, Teemu D. Laajala, William J. Geese, Justin Guinney, Joseph D. Szustakowski, Benjamin G. Vincent, David P. Carbone (Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
25 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Predictive biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy are currently lacking for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we describe the results from the Anti-PD-1 Response Prediction DREAM Challenge, a crowdsourced initiative that enabled the assessment of predictive models by using data from two randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of ICIs in first-line metastatic NSCLC.

METHODS: Participants developed and trained models using public resources. These were evaluated with data from the CheckMate 026 trial (NCT02041533), according to the model-to-data paradigm to maintain patient confidentiality. The generalizability of the models with the best predictive performance was assessed using data from the CheckMate 227 trial (NCT02477826). Both trials were phase III RCTs with a chemotherapy control arm, which supported the differentiation between predictive and prognostic models. Isolated model containers were evaluated using a bespoke strategy that considered the challenges of handling transcriptome data from clinical trials.

RESULTS: A total of 59 teams participated, with 417 models submitted. Multiple predictive models, as opposed to a prognostic model, were generated for predicting overall survival, progression-free survival, and progressive disease status with ICIs. Variables within the models submitted by participants included tumor mutational burden (TMB), programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, and gene-expression-based signatures. The best-performing models showed improved predictive power over reference variables, including TMB or PD-L1.

CONCLUSIONS: This DREAM Challenge is the first successful attempt to use protected phase III clinical data for a crowdsourced effort towards generating predictive models for ICI clinical outcomes and could serve as a blueprint for similar efforts in other tumor types and disease states, setting a benchmark for future studies aiming to identify biomarkers predictive of ICI efficacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: CheckMate 026; NCT02041533, registered January 22, 2014. CheckMate 227; NCT02477826, registered June 23, 2015.

Original languageEnglish
Article number190
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Translational Medicine
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Feb 2024

Bibliographical note

© 2024. The Author(s).

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use
  • Lung Neoplasms/pathology
  • B7-H1 Antigen
  • Biomarkers, Tumor
  • Programmed death ligand 1
  • Immune checkpoint inhibitor
  • Predictive model
  • Crowdsource
  • Non-small cell lung cancer
  • Biomarkers
  • Programmed death-1

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A community challenge to predict clinical outcomes after immune checkpoint blockade in non-small cell lung cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this