A case of industrial vs. open-source OCL: not so different after all

J.G.M. Mengerink, J.F.H. Noten, R. Schiffelers, M.G.J. van den Brand, A. Serebrenik

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperAcademic

38 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

When studying model-driven engineering (MDE) in industry, generalization of studies is often hard, as most artifacts are proprietary and confidential in nature. A possible solution would be to study open-source artifacts. However, open-source artifacts are not necessarily representative for those found in the industry. As the first step towards investigating the viability of open-source MDE artifacts as an alternative to less accessible industrial ones, we use a large
open-source dataset and several industrial meta-models to show that the
complexity of OCL expressions in open-source and industry is similar.
Original languageEnglish
Pages472-474
Number of pages3
Publication statusPublished - 2017
EventACM/IEEE 20th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2017) - Austin, United States
Duration: 17 Sep 201717 Sep 2017
Conference number: 20

Conference

ConferenceACM/IEEE 20th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2017)
Abbreviated titleModels 2017
CountryUnited States
CityAustin
Period17/09/1717/09/17
OtherMODELS 2017 Satellite Event: Workshops (ModComp, ME, EXE, COMMitMDE, MRT, MULTI, GEMOC, MoDeVVa, MDETools, FlexMDE, MDEbug), Posters, Doctoral Symposium, Educator Symposium, ACM Student Research Competition, and Tools and Demonstrations co-located with ACM/IEEE 20th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A case of industrial vs. open-source OCL: not so different after all'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this