A case of industrial vs. open-source OCL: not so different after all

J.G.M. Mengerink, J.F.H. Noten, R. Schiffelers, M.G.J. van den Brand, A. Serebrenik

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperAcademic

28 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

When studying model-driven engineering (MDE) in industry, generalization of studies is often hard, as most artifacts are proprietary and confidential in nature. A possible solution would be to study open-source artifacts. However, open-source artifacts are not necessarily representative for those found in the industry. As the first step towards investigating the viability of open-source MDE artifacts as an alternative to less accessible industrial ones, we use a large
open-source dataset and several industrial meta-models to show that the
complexity of OCL expressions in open-source and industry is similar.
Original languageEnglish
Pages472-474
Number of pages3
Publication statusPublished - 2017
EventACM/IEEE 20th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2017) - Austin, United States
Duration: 17 Sep 201717 Sep 2017
Conference number: 20

Conference

ConferenceACM/IEEE 20th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2017)
Abbreviated titleModels 2017
CountryUnited States
CityAustin
Period17/09/1717/09/17
OtherMODELS 2017 Satellite Event: Workshops (ModComp, ME, EXE, COMMitMDE, MRT, MULTI, GEMOC, MoDeVVa, MDETools, FlexMDE, MDEbug), Posters, Doctoral Symposium, Educator Symposium, ACM Student Research Competition, and Tools and Demonstrations co-located with ACM/IEEE 20th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems

Fingerprint

industry
engineering
viability

Cite this

Mengerink, J. G. M., Noten, J. F. H., Schiffelers, R., van den Brand, M. G. J., & Serebrenik, A. (2017). A case of industrial vs. open-source OCL: not so different after all. 472-474. Paper presented at ACM/IEEE 20th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2017), Austin, United States.
Mengerink, J.G.M. ; Noten, J.F.H. ; Schiffelers, R. ; van den Brand, M.G.J. ; Serebrenik, A. / A case of industrial vs. open-source OCL : not so different after all. Paper presented at ACM/IEEE 20th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2017), Austin, United States.3 p.
@conference{fbc294cf99544af3a4c33de9cda42a96,
title = "A case of industrial vs. open-source OCL: not so different after all",
abstract = "When studying model-driven engineering (MDE) in industry, generalization of studies is often hard, as most artifacts are proprietary and confidential in nature. A possible solution would be to study open-source artifacts. However, open-source artifacts are not necessarily representative for those found in the industry. As the first step towards investigating the viability of open-source MDE artifacts as an alternative to less accessible industrial ones, we use a largeopen-source dataset and several industrial meta-models to show that thecomplexity of OCL expressions in open-source and industry is similar.",
author = "J.G.M. Mengerink and J.F.H. Noten and R. Schiffelers and {van den Brand}, M.G.J. and A. Serebrenik",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
pages = "472--474",
note = "ACM/IEEE 20th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2017), Models 2017 ; Conference date: 17-09-2017 Through 17-09-2017",

}

Mengerink, JGM, Noten, JFH, Schiffelers, R, van den Brand, MGJ & Serebrenik, A 2017, 'A case of industrial vs. open-source OCL: not so different after all' Paper presented at ACM/IEEE 20th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2017), Austin, United States, 17/09/17 - 17/09/17, pp. 472-474.

A case of industrial vs. open-source OCL : not so different after all. / Mengerink, J.G.M.; Noten, J.F.H.; Schiffelers, R.; van den Brand, M.G.J.; Serebrenik, A.

2017. 472-474 Paper presented at ACM/IEEE 20th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2017), Austin, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperAcademic

TY - CONF

T1 - A case of industrial vs. open-source OCL

T2 - not so different after all

AU - Mengerink, J.G.M.

AU - Noten, J.F.H.

AU - Schiffelers, R.

AU - van den Brand, M.G.J.

AU - Serebrenik, A.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - When studying model-driven engineering (MDE) in industry, generalization of studies is often hard, as most artifacts are proprietary and confidential in nature. A possible solution would be to study open-source artifacts. However, open-source artifacts are not necessarily representative for those found in the industry. As the first step towards investigating the viability of open-source MDE artifacts as an alternative to less accessible industrial ones, we use a largeopen-source dataset and several industrial meta-models to show that thecomplexity of OCL expressions in open-source and industry is similar.

AB - When studying model-driven engineering (MDE) in industry, generalization of studies is often hard, as most artifacts are proprietary and confidential in nature. A possible solution would be to study open-source artifacts. However, open-source artifacts are not necessarily representative for those found in the industry. As the first step towards investigating the viability of open-source MDE artifacts as an alternative to less accessible industrial ones, we use a largeopen-source dataset and several industrial meta-models to show that thecomplexity of OCL expressions in open-source and industry is similar.

M3 - Paper

SP - 472

EP - 474

ER -

Mengerink JGM, Noten JFH, Schiffelers R, van den Brand MGJ, Serebrenik A. A case of industrial vs. open-source OCL: not so different after all. 2017. Paper presented at ACM/IEEE 20th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2017), Austin, United States.