A 103-dB SFDR Calibration-Free Oversampled SAR ADC with Mismatch Error Shaping and Pre-Comparison Techniques

Yuting Shen (Corresponding author), Hanyue Li, Haoming Xin, Eugenio Cantatore, Pieter Harpe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)
662 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This work presents a 14-bit oversampled successive-approximation-register (SAR) analog-to-digital converter (ADC) with mismatch error shaping (MES) and pre-comparison techniques. A pre-comparison technique is proposed to solve the over-range problem caused by MES. With MES and pre-comparison, the digital-to-analog converter (DAC) mismatch error can be first-order shaped, while a full input range is maintained. Besides, data-driven noise reduction and chopping techniques are combined to reduce the comparator noise efficiently. The prototype in 65-nm CMOS achieves 84.5-dB signal-to-noise-and-distortion ratio (SNDR) and 103-dB spurious-free dynamic range (SFDR) in a 4-kHz bandwidth, with a power consumption of 0.98 mu {W} from a single 0.8-V supply and an area of 0.033 mm2, resulting in a Schreier figure of merit (FoM) of 180.6 dB and a Walden FoM of 8.9 fJ/conversion-step, respectively. Among ADCs with above 100-dB SFDR, this is the smallest design without calibration and the only sub- mu {W} and sub-1-V design. These features make it suitable for high-resolution and low-cost applications.

Original languageEnglish
Article number9663409
Pages (from-to)734-744
Number of pages11
JournalIEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits
Volume57
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2022

Keywords

  • Analog-to-digital converter (ADC)
  • calibration free
  • chopping
  • digital-to-analog converter (DAC)
  • low cost
  • mismatch error shaping (MES)
  • pre-comparison
  • successive approximation register (SAR)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A 103-dB SFDR Calibration-Free Oversampled SAR ADC with Mismatch Error Shaping and Pre-Comparison Techniques'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this